Every coach has had this moment. You explain the new press on Tuesday. It looks decent by the end of the session. Gameday comes, the first ball goes long, and nobody steps. So you stand on the sideline wondering how a group of intelligent players managed to forget something you explained clearly just a few days ago.
Here is the thing. They probably did not forget it. They never had it.
There is a simple set of numbers that explains the gap, and once you see it you cannot unsee it in your own sessions. Three, five, seven, nine. Read separately they look like four unrelated rules of thumb. Read together they are one ladder, tracking how information travels from heard to owned.
Three is how much a person can absorb at once.
Five is the number of repetitions that pushes something from short-term into long-term memory.
Seven is the number of exposures before someone can recall it unprompted.
Nine is the number of repetitions before they have internalised it well enough to execute it under pressure and explain it back to a teammate.
The whole coaching problem sits in the gap between one and nine. We say it once and assume it landed. The pattern actually has to repeat roughly nine times before it is genuinely theirs.
A note on the numbers: treat three, five, seven and nine as practitioner rules of thumb, not laboratory constants. They are useful because they force a coach to plan volume and revisits, not because a study has fixed the exact figure. What the coaching literature does back up, strongly, is the shape of the ladder.
Rung one: three, cap the message
Three is the ceiling of what a player can hold at once. Load in more than three ideas and the earlier ones start falling out. So the discipline here is not addition, it is subtraction. Decide the three takeaways you actually want them to leave with, and cut everything else.
This is one of the oldest lessons in coaching. John Wooden once handed his players what amounted to an encyclopedia of his methods and watched them fail to absorb any of it. He learned to deliver a little information at a time, correctly sequenced, because good digestion of small pieces beats overload every time (John Wooden & Steve Jamison, The Essential Wooden, Part II).
There is a second reason to keep it to three, and it is about who carries the burden. Malcolm Gladwell draws a useful distinction between transmitter-oriented and receiver-oriented communication: in the first, the speaker owns clarity, in the second the listener has to infer what you meant (Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers, Ch. 7). A four-point, six-point, nine-point coaching intervention quietly shifts the work onto the player. Three points, stated plainly, keeps the clarity where it belongs.
On the pitch
Coach any drill on at most three points. Save the rest for the next rep or the next session.
Set the pre-match talk on three clear intentions, for example press as a unit, transfer early, get numbers into the D.
Break a full penalty corner routine into the three roles a given player must remember, not the whole board.
Give post-match feedback in threes: one thing that worked, one to fix, one to try next week.
Rung two: five, build the reps that encode
Five is roughly the point where information stops being fragile. Below it, a new skill or pattern is held for the session and gone by the next one. Five quality reps is the floor for anything to begin sticking.
Daniel Coyle's work is blunt about why. Skill circuits build in one direction, which is why grooved habits are so hard to erase and why the only dependable way to change a technique is to repeat a new, correct pattern until it becomes automatic (Daniel Coyle, The Talent Code, Ch. 2). A single demonstration followed by a rotation does not lay anything down. It just shows the player what they are missing.
Coyle also gives three concrete tools that fit this rung neatly. When a player first gets it right, freeze and let them memorise the feeling, which he calls marking the spot. Fix a recurring error with the sandwich technique, correct, incorrect, correct. And use the 3x10 technique, practising three times with ten-minute breaks in between, because spaced reps encode better than crammed ones (Daniel Coyle, The Little Book of Talent, Tips #29, #34, #35).
That last point matters for session design. Five reps back to back feels efficient and encodes poorly. Five reps spread across the session, revisited after other work, is the same volume doing far more.
On the pitch
Give every player at least five clean reps of a new skill, a reverse stick trap, an aerial, a leading run, before adding pressure.
Run a new outlet or press trigger five times in a controlled, unopposed shape first.
Space those five reps across the session rather than stacking them.
The moment a player nails it, stop and name it. That is the rep you want them to remember.
Rung three: seven, reinforce until they can recall it
Five got it stored. Seven is when they can retrieve it without you calling for it. The structure exists in memory, but they are still leaning on your cue to reach for it.
The useful insight at this rung is that the seven exposures should not be seven identical drills. Coyle's research on chunking shows that experts recognise nested patterns rather than isolated pieces, and that all skill is built from small circuits grouped into larger ones (Daniel Coyle, The Talent Code, Ch. 4). If a player only ever meets the new press inside one drill, that is what they have learned. The drill, not the principle.
He also warns about plateaus. When a pattern becomes semi-automatic, players slip onto autopilot and growth stops. The fix is to jostle them back into the sweet spot by changing the method, going faster, slower, or in reverse (Daniel Coyle, The Little Book of Talent, Tip #49). Variety at this rung is not decoration. It is what turns a drill into a transferable principle.
On the pitch
Revisit a new press or defensive shape across several sessions, using a walkthrough, a small-sided game, video, and a match scenario.
Change the format each time so they recall the principle rather than one specific set-up.
Until they can call it and adjust it themselves on the pitch, treat it as not yet recalled and keep reinforcing.
Rung four: nine, repeat until it is theirs
This is the rung most coaching skips. Nine is roughly the number of repetitions before something is internalised well enough that a player can execute it under fatigue, against an opponent, and explain it back to a teammate. Below nine it looks learned in a calm drill and collapses in a game.
Two ideas explain why this rung is worth the patience.
The first is retrieval. Learning sticks when the learner generates or retrieves the answer themselves rather than passively receiving it, and one real attempt is worth many passive observations (Daniel Coyle, The Talent Code, Ch. 1). That gives you a genuine test of internalisation: hand it over. Ask a player to explain or lead the routine. If they can coach it to a teammate, it is owned. If they cannot, you have your answer, and it has nothing to do with effort.
The All Blacks culture that James Kerr documents leans on the same logic through questioning rather than instructing. An interrogative culture, what would you do here, what might happen if, builds self-awareness and decision-makers instead of players waiting to be told (James Kerr, Legacy, Ch. 1). At the top of the ladder, questions are a better tool than cues.
The second idea is why any of this pays off. Kahneman's law of least effort holds that the mind gravitates to the least demanding option, and that as a skill is mastered it demands less effort, which frees attention for other things (Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Ch. 2). That is exactly what you are buying with rep nine. Not a prettier routine, but a player whose attention is free to read the game while executing it.
On the pitch
Keep drilling a penalty corner, a transfer of play, or a circle entry pattern well past the point it looks learned. Aim for nine full-intensity reps.
Test internalisation by handing it over. Get a player to run the routine and explain it.
Resist calling it done after one sharp session.
What the ladder changes about how you plan
Here is where it gets uncomfortable, in a productive way. The ladder resets the timeline for anything you teach.
A new attacking corner variation is not a one-session job. It is a multi-week arc: introduced in three cues, encoded with five reps, recalled after seven exposures, internalised around nine. Which means the honest question at the end of a session is not "did they do it?" but "which rung are they on?"
Wooden's answer to this was total preparation. He planned every minute of practice on index cards, on the principle that thorough preparation removes the need for luck, and that luck, when it matters, is the residue of design (John Wooden & Steve Jamison, The Essential Wooden, Part I). Applied here, design means building your block plan so the important patterns get revisited enough times to reach the top rung, rather than hoping a good Tuesday session holds until gameday.
It also means teaching less. A season plan with four genuinely internalised patterns beats one with twelve half-learned ones, because the twelve all collapse at the same moment, the moment the game gets fast.
So the next time a structure falls apart on gameday, try a different question. Not "why did they forget?" but "how many times had they actually met this?" If the answer is once or twice, the players are not the problem. The plan is.
Three takeaways, because the rule applies here too
Cap every coaching message at three points.
Plan volume and revisits, not single explanations. Five to encode, seven to recall, nine to own.
Test ownership by handing it over. If a player can coach it to a teammate, it is theirs.
Ideas in this piece are drawn from books relevant for coaches, including John Wooden and Steve Jamison's The Essential Wooden*, Daniel Coyle's* The Talent Code and The Little Book of Talent*, James Kerr's* Legacy*, Malcolm Gladwell's* Outliers*, and Daniel Kahneman's* Thinking, Fast and Slow*.*
Rung two, for you
By its own argument, this piece has met you once. That is not enough for anything to stick.
Three masterclasses sit on the same problem from different angles: how much to put into one session, how often to come back to it, and how to build a block that actually gets there.
Session Design, with Tsoanelo Pholo
Practice Session Design, with Fede Tanuscio
Periodisation for Club Coaches with several international top coaches
Full access to the archive is €9.99 a month.
Which rung is your team actually on?
