There is a comfortable story in hockey that goes something like this. The aerial belongs to the men's game. It is a weapon for the players who can throw it from goal to goal, and the women's game is one played on the floor. It is a tidy story, and it lets a lot of coaches off the hook. It is also, to borrow Glenn Simpson's own word from this session, complete bullshit.
Glenn spent most of his playing days and his early coaching life in the men's game in Australia, and for the last three seasons he has been working with women's teams in Belgium, including the Antwerp first team and the Belgian U21 girls. What he is seeing is not a capability gap. The women can flick, they can flick a long way, and the distances are growing fast. The gap is a coaching gap. The teams who learn to build around the aerial are about to make life very uncomfortable for everyone still defending like the ball never leaves the ground.
So let's get into it. We will look at where the high ball is showing up first, how defences are already scrambling to cope, why the diagonal is the real story, and the one thing almost nobody trains enough. Then we will finish with three things you can take onto the pitch tomorrow.
TL;DR
The aerial is arriving in the women's game, and it is going to force coaches to evolve their tactics. It shows up first as a way to break the press from Ball Start 1, using central midfield overloads and a long flick to the halfway line, and as the diagonal ball into and around the circle from Ball Start 3. Defences are already adapting by retreating their press, defending with four midfielders, and leaning more toward man-orientation on big restarts. The real bottleneck is not strength, and not even the flick, it is the quality of the reception, especially on the move and above the shoulder. Build confidence in training before you ask for it in games, treat technique as the priority over the gym, introduce it around U14 and into matches around U16, and never forget that the high ball is one tool in the kit, not the whole kit.
It is a coaching gap, not a capability gap
The most important idea runs underneath everything else Glenn says. When a young player cannot yet play a confident high ball, that is a training history, not a ceiling. He pointed to players in his own club environment who are excellent exponents of the aerial, and to a girl at the Junior World Cup playing diagonals for Argentina of a length you would expect from a senior international.
The distances are the part that should make every defensive coach sit up. Glenn described balls now leaving the stick at the top of the circle and landing five or six metres behind the 23, carrying somewhere around 50 to 55 yards in the air, and 60 to 65 by the time they bounce. For years, presses in the women's game have been built on the safe assumption that nobody can hurt you behind a compact block. That assumption is dying, and it is dying quickly.
Breaking the press from Ball Start 1
The first place this shows up is the restart from the top of the circle, what Glenn calls Ball Start 1. The pattern he sees a lot in Belgium is a midfield overload. You keep a low central contact who plays small drop and bite passes to attract the press inside, then you load the middle with three midfielders plus a post-up striker, a number 10 who pins. The aim is to overload the opponent's central midfielder, pin them with two players, and open the space either inside or outside them for a long flick to the halfway line.
Break the press that way and you arrive in the attacking half with one pass, ready to play five against five in half a pitch with all that space behind the defence to attack at speed. Glenn was clear this is not a Belgian quirk. He showed Argentina doing exactly the same against Belgium's press at the Junior World Cup. From a restart, with presses so good at turning won balls into goals, teams would rather break the press with an aerial and a midfield overload than take a low-reward risk on the floor through the congested middle.
How defences are fighting back
The interesting part for the tactics nerds is the response. Glenn showed Gantoise, the strongest side in Belgium, managing this by bringing their centre forward back, effectively defending with four midfielders, pushing the free defender up to take away the overload, and retreating the whole press to keep that back space compact. He is also starting to see more willingness to defend man-on-man, or at least man-orientated, from these restarts, specifically to take the high balls away and force the ball back to the ground.
That sparked a great question from Bongani in South Africa about whether you should stay zonal to manage aerials. Glenn's honest answer was that it depends on where your players come from. A Belgian youth product grows up zonal and finds man-on-man harder. An Australian or South African grows up man-orientated and finds full zone harder. His prediction is that the women's game will drift toward what the men's game already does, more man-responsibility on the big-pitch restarts, because pure zone simply gives a good aerial team too much space to attack.
The diagonal is the real evolution
If there is one idea to take from this session, it is the diagonal ball. Traditionally, women's presses sit very compact and central, which forces the ball back through the middle where all the numbers are, and the game gets congested and safe. The moment a team can play a diagonal aerial from a pocket or a sideline position, that whole logic breaks. Now you can unlock the press from the side instead of the centre, and you can drop a player into the inside space that the compact press has left open.
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paying subscriber of The Hockey Site to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
• Unlimited access to our on demand archive of videos and articles
• Subscription to our newsletter
• Full access to content that can earn you CPD credits with FIH
• Access to Assistant.Hockey - your AI coach assistant


